Read this article!
http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2009/11/11/DADT_Likely_To_Be_Part_of_Defense_Bill/
Ok… this is how the Dems do things. Imagine what is going to happen next year when conservatives oppose this measure. The Democrats will claim that the Republicans are weak on national defense. They will claim that the Republicans care more about ideology then they do the troops in the field in places like Afghanistan and Iraq. The Lame-Stream Media will side with the Democrats. This is exactly how they handled the federal budget during the Reagan years: after shelving 7 out of 8 of Reagan’s budget proposals, then attaching pork barrel projects that Reagan was forced to veto, and then claiming Reagan cared more about ideology than the nation.
And according to Frank, he’s only doing what they always do. I agree, if by “they” he means lousy liberal Democrats who care more about ideology then they do the morale of our troops, i.e. our nation.
This article claims that Clinton’s “Don’t ask don’t tell” policy was a ban on gays serving openly in the military, which is completely wrong. There has ALWAYS been a ban on gays in the military because that particular mental disorder affects, dramatically and negatively, morale. The Clinton administration allowed gays to serve in the military – they just had to keep their disorder, or sickness, or “preference” to themselves. In other words, his policy was a first step towards removing the ban against people who suffer from this mental disorder. I served our nation in the U.S. Navy for 6 years. Nothing destroyed morale more than the escapades and flamboyant attitudes of the effeminate. We had to share berthing spaces, restrooms and work spaces with them and our only two concerns were: 1) that they kept their sick personal lives to themselves, and 2) that the military take every precaution to ensure that straight soldiers, sailors and marines don’t get infected by aids, which still affects, predominantly, gays. Of course, the only way to ensure #2 is to ban gays completely from the military. In a nutshell, the Clinton administration only helped to weaken the military in order to score brownie points among his pink constituents. Of course, since Clinton was a draft dodger it’s doubtful that he cares about weakening the military.
I was serving at the time that “Don’t ask, don’t tell” became official policy. Trust me when I say, the over whelming majority of military personnel were against this policy – and knew that it was just the first step – or rather, another incremental step in the overall process of liberalizing away our nation’s moral principles towards Socialism. And the gays that were serving? They were thrilled. They were jubilant…and for the same reason. And make no mistake about it, while no one was asking, they were all TELLING, vociferously. The Clinton policy would be more aptly named, “Don’t ask, don’t yell.”
And at a time when we should consider expanding the ban to include Muslims, why is Barney Frank so eager to get this passed next year? With the economy in the dire shape that it’s in; with REAL unemployment at 17.5%, higher even than at the outset of the Great Depression, our nation at war with jihadists inside and outside of our country, why is repealing “Don’t ask, don’t tell” so important? I think you’d have to be a completely witless moron not to see that Frank knows the Democrats are out next year, and he’s desperately doing anything he can to ram through the most destructively liberal legislation while he has the chance.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Smartukus,
ReplyDeleteAs you know, it isn't about 'equality' or 'fairness'. It is about destroying any semblance of virtue or morality. It is about subverting natural law with hedonism for the sole purpose of corrupting society.
If national socialist health care is forced upon us, wait to see how people will be denied real medical care (coronary bypass surgery, joint replacement surgery, renal dialysis, cancer treatments...) because of the politically correct medical "procedures" of abortion, gender reassignment surgery (mutilation of the mentally ill) and alleged erectile dysfunction.
I have already tried writing my marxist senators and congressional representative to point out to them the clear violation of the First Amendment free expression of religion that the nazi health care use of federal tax dollars to pay for any abortion would be. I pointed out that they would be violating their oaths of office - by failing to uphold the U.S. Constitution if they vote for any health care legislation that allows for federal money to be used to pay for abortion in any form. I told them that I take my oath to protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign AND DOMESTIC, very seriously...and that their attack on the First Amendment makes them domestic enemies of the Constitution, against whom I am sworn to oppose. Since I do not have the ability to rise up in armed rebellion against them, I am left with only the option of civil disobedience. Hence, I will no longer pay federal income tax if this legislation is passed in any form that allows federal tax dollars to pay for abortion. I will not be made complicit in the grave sin of abortion - which is what happens if I pay federal taxes and the government uses a single penny to pay for the murder of the unborn. I am aware that refusal to pay federal income taxes will result in my being thrown in jail. Once that happens, I will go on a hunger strike, as such imprisonment is also unconstitutional. One cannot be lawfully imprisoned for practicing one's religion.
The Chicago thug currently befouling the Oval Office doesn't have enough prison cells for all the pro-life individuals in this country to stop paying taxes. If pro-life individuals simply stop buying anything except essential food items, the already weakened economy will further collapse.
This is a moment in history when we will be measured, and either be found worthy, or found wanting.